Business Blogs
Great September Hike: Deseret Peak
by lavarr
Sep 02, 2010 | 2026 views | 0 0 comments | 1 1 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

September is a great month. Football . . . cool temperatures . . . great hiking weather. I recently hiked with family members to the top of Deseret Peak, a gorgeous hike, close by, that is never crowded. The Stansbury Mountains are suprisingly green and lush once you get into the canyons.

At the top of Deseret Peak, majestic views open up in all directions. Mount Timpanogas, Mount Nebo, Francis Peak, Simpson Springs, Ibapah and the Deep Creeks, Rush Valley, Skull Valley, the Salt Flats, and the Great Salt Lake are all visible from the 11,000-foot summit. It's a steep hike at the end, and it pays to be in good shape.

Here's a short description of the hike, from the trailhead in South Willow Canyon, at Utah.com: http://www.utah.com/hike/deseret_peak.htm 

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Harmer Campaign Covered by San Francisco Chronicle
by lavarr
Sep 02, 2010 | 605 views | 0 0 comments | 1 1 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

Former Utahn David Harmer, who is running as a Republican against incumbent Democrat Jerry McNerney in California's 11th Congressional District in the Bay Area, is receiving a fair amount of publicity as one of the National Republican Congressional Campaign Committee's "young guns."

Harmer is considered to be one of the GOP challengers most likely to defeat a Democrat.

Read a San Francisco Chronicle story about the race here.

Harmer also recently received an endorsement and some fundraising help from Dick Morris, the conservative commentator and political strategist.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Raising Heck – Inside The 8/28 Rally
Aug 30, 2010 | 380 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

Staging rallies is not a tactic typically employed by the right. Following in the protest-marching footsteps of the 60s counter-culture, liberals have, generally speaking, made that particular form of political communication theirs

One of the hypotheses for this fact is that conservatives tend to have busier schedules – it’s much easier for college students and DINKs to attend an anti-war protest than it is for people juggling kids’ soccer games, choir practice, and a full-time job to make it to, say, an anti-anti-war protest. 

So when conservatives do hold public rallies, it’s much more interesting to watch. How do mild-mannered, law-abiding conservatives behave when they want to raise a little, well, “heck”? 

We got the chance to see that on Saturday, when Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin held a “Restoring Honor” event at the steps of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C., as an estimated quarter-million or more Americans gathered to talk about faith, love, patriotism, and respect for veterans. 

 

 

The attendants (can’t really say “protesters) came dressed in all manner of flag-themed clothing, with the occasionally military uniform and three-corner hat thrown in. And as for behavior, the results were stunning. It’s hard to imagine that 250,000 (or more) people could gather in such a limited space and conduct themselves so well. The atmosphere was polite, friendly, and clean. (I did not see a piece of litter the whole day.) 

What’s equally interesting to watch is the coverage of such an event. The 8/28 rally caused a little bit of a stir because of the date – the anniversary of the Reverend Doctor’s “I have a dream” speech. Several outlets felt compelled to make jabs at Beck’s rally (the AP, in their lead, noted that it was a “predominantly white” crowd) while skimming over the fact that it boasted more participants than Al Sharpton’s competing rally by orders of magnitude.

Participants came from across the country, with good representation from Utah. Politicians and their staff came out, knowing that the LDS Beck is a popular favorite back home. Having said that, the event was surprisingly apolitical – Beck specifically asked that no one bring political signs and made no threatening remarks about the forthcoming election.…

 

Though, with the White House only about a mile away, he probably didn’t need to.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Political Ad Watch – Taking a Shower
Aug 30, 2010 | 75 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

When you’re virtually assured a win, it’s easy to take the high road with your campaign.  However, one ad in the Colorado Governor’s race is notable for its creativity.

Democrat John Hickenlooper has an amusing ad railing against negative campaigning featuring him in the shower.  Chris Cillizza says the ad is possible because there’s almost no chance Hickenlooper will face a serious challenge in November.

While the ad is creative and effective, there are a few mitigating factors that suggest it may be tough for other "outsider" candidates to copy it in their own races.

First and most importantly, the Colorado Republican Party has imploded in recent weeks. 
Former Rep.
 Scott McInnis, long touted as the party's strongest nominee, watched his political stock plummet in the wake of plagiarism charges. That left room for little known Dan Maes, himself struggling under campaign finance fine, to oust McInnis in the Aug. 10 primary.

With Maes as the nominee, it's hard to imagine the Republican Governors Association spending any money on the race and it's equally difficult to see Maes raising the sort of money on his own to compete with Hickenlooper.

That financial mismatch means that the race isn't much of a race and Hickenlooper's pledge of no negative ads is somewhat penalty-free. He gets the benefit of looking like a different sort of politician without running the risk of losing the race to a better funded -- and better known -- Republican who goes negative.

In the interest of full disclosure, I worked with Mayor Hickenlooper on occasion when he filled in as a talk show host at KOA radio in the early 1990's.

Watch the ad below.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Political Ad Watch: Young Frankenstein Parody
Aug 26, 2010 | 267 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

It’s a given that every election cycle produces its share of strange and weird political ads.  However, an ad in a California Congressional race tests the boundaries of weirdness.

Republican candidate Mattie Fein, who is running against Democratic incumbent Jane Harman has unleashed this parody of the Mel Brooks classic movie “Young Frankenstein.”  Apparently, the point is something about nuclear technology going to Iran and federal bailouts.  Just watch…

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Creepy Ad Watch: Minnesota Governor
Aug 24, 2010 | 146 views | 2 2 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

If you’re looking for a political ad that is effective yet unsettling at the same time, look no further than the spot put out by Tom Horner, the gubernatorial nominee of the Minnesota Independence Party.

The ad, titled “Eyeballs,” features a closeup on a mans face with a red eyeball and blue eyeball pointed outward.  Watch video below.

Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
LadyLogician
|
August 26, 2010

That is my "home" state.  In our defense realize that Horner is running from the party that Jesse Ventura (as in Jesse "the Body" Ventura of WWE fame) put on the ballot.....

LL

remmick
|
August 25, 2010

That's really odd.

Germany Leads Europe With Conservative Economic Policies
by lavarr
Aug 22, 2010 | 64 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

A major international debate has raged over competing ways to energize the economy -- stimulate with deficit spending, or spend modestly with a more austere approach.

Well, a recent New York Times story notes that German has taken a conservative approach to fighting the recession and it seems to be winning, with quarterly economic growth equal to a nearly 9% annual rate, the best in 20 years, if current growth stays on track. Meanwhile, in the U.S., which is spending big and running up massive deficits, and in free-spending European countries, economies are floundering and threatening to dip back into recession.   

Says the Times story:

Germany has sparred with its European partners over how to respond to the financial crisis, argued with the United States over the benefits of stimulus versus austerity, and defiantly pursued its own vision of how to keep its economy strong. ...

By paring unemployment benefits, easing rules for hiring and firing, and management and labor’s working together to keep a lid on wages, Germany ensured that it could again export its way to growth with competitive, nimble companies producing the cars and machine tools the world’s economies — emerging and developed alike — demanded.

Germans steered clear of the debt-fueled consumption boom that many believe contributed to the financial crisis. During the recession, Chancellor Angela Merkel resisted the palliative of government spending that the United States and some European partners felt was crucial to restoring growth.

Read the entire story here.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Federalism Watch: Madison Amendment Introduced
by lavarr
Aug 17, 2010 | 55 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

 

 

There is a vibrant discussion throughout America today on federalism. “The 10” is a regular summary of 10 noteworthy federalism stories or thought-provoking commentary designed to provide people access to this discussion.  Not all items included in “The 10” are supported or endorsed by the members of the Task Force.

“The 10”

1)   Madison Amendment Introduced in Congress.  Before leaving for recess, a bipartisan group of lawmakers introduced the “Madison Amendment” to help restore a healthy balance of state and federal power in our Constitutional system of government.

 

2)    Federalism Strikes Back.  Greg Schneider, a senior fellow with the Kansas Policy Institute, argues that the long overdue, but growing, recognition of federalist principles across the country may be a sign of a new and long overdue American revolution.  

 

3)    State’s Rights Should be Encouraged.  Former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson argues that “The time has never been better for a long-overdue reassessment of the balance of power between the federal government and the 50 individual states.”

 

4)    What Federalism Means.  In a post on the Cordoba House controversy, Josh Barro makes a couple insightful points about federalism:  “Part of supporting limited government is understanding that sometimes, things you don’t like will happen…” and that “Getting to do what you want comes at the price of other people getting to do what they want…”

 

5)    Rewriting History.  The author Brion McClanahan writes a devastating rebuttal to recent criticism of the 10th Amendment movement.  It’s a little long, but definitely worth a read.

 

6)    Federalism - A Far Better Approach.  Former Justice Department official, John Yoo ties the knot between the gay marriage controversy and federalism.    

 

7)    U.S. News & World Report Columnist Encourages Secession.  Jamie Stiehm disagrees with South Carolina, Texas, and Arizona for standard D.C.-centric reasons.  Her solution?  Secession!      

 

8)    Obamacare Kills State Health Care Innovation.  The Manhattan Institute’s Paul Howard explains how Obamacare could destroy Indiana’s promising experiment in health-care reform.

 

9)    The 10th Amendment Sprouts in the Blue Grass State.  The movement continues to grow as the Tenth Amendment Center launches a state chapter in Kentucky.  

 

10)  Flashback:  In 2006, Richard Samuelson asked the simple question:  Can Federalism Solve America’s Cultural War?

If you have an item to include in the “The 10,” please contact Cody Stewart at 202 225-8411.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Voter Registration in a Digital Age
by lavarr
Aug 12, 2010 | 63 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law has published a new paper, "Voter Registration in a Digital Age," which examines a recent and growing trend in various states of using modern technology to improve the voter registration system. A Brennan Center message about the paper says:

America's paper-based voter registration system is overly costly, duplicative and rife with error.  This report documents two new paperless registration procedures now being implemented in the states -- automated registration, where voter registration agencies electronically collect and transfer registration applications, and online registration, where citizens submit applications over the Internet. 

These state reforms increase voter roll accuracy, boost the number of registrations, and save millions of dollars a year.  These changes are remarkably easy to develop and maintain, and they enjoy broad bipartisan support from state policymakers and election officials alike.

Among the report's findings:

  • DMV voter registrations nearly doubled in Washington and Kansas, and increased by even more in Rhode Island and South Dakota, after automation.
  • An analysis in Arizona found that electronic registrations are as much as five times less error-prone than paper.
  • Delaware's paperless "motor voter" system saves election officials more than $200,000 annually; Arizona's paperless system saved its largest county more than $450,000 in 2008.

This wave of reform should spur similar progress nationally.  For more information, please contact us or visit our website

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Test Your Political News IQ
by lavarr
Aug 12, 2010 | 54 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

See how smart you are about current events by taking the Pew News IQ test.

It's a quick, easy quiz on political news knowledge. And it's pretty easy. I got 11 of 11 questions correct, better than 95% of the public.

Take the quiz here.

Check out lots of interesting survey research at Pew Research Center.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Reader Response: Fields vs. Duckworth
by lavarr
Aug 12, 2010 | 82 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

I read with great interest your featured article on the mid-term House races – especially regarding the race for the seat representing Legislative District 22, where challenger Noel Fields is running against incumbent Susan Duckworth.  I found the comments by Utah Democratic Party Executive Director Todd Taylor to be highly amusing.

Noel has met with voters in Legislative District 22 in Community Council meetings, on front door-steps and at community events throughout the summer. What Noel has heard most are voters' real priorities: rising property/income taxes, worries about job security and the overall cost of government, which has been growing thanks to additional “fees” like the Unified Police Department fee imposed by the Salt Lake County Council (led Democrat Peter Corroon). We continue to hear voters emphasize how imperative job creation is and how we need to sustain Utah’s positive economy.

Meanwhile, Mr. Taylor trotted out the old Democratic warhorse: Republicans want to cut your government benefits. I’m surprised that these misleading allegations are out so early this year. Usually this ghost story is told around Halloween.

The fact is Noel hasn't addressed this issue. Social Security and Medicare entitlements are federal entitlements - local legislative candidates have no say in this spending.  Noel cares for seniors and others on Medicare and/or Social Security. However he realizes that we must live within our means. Noel gets that an extra $200 a year isn't something someone on a fixed income can easily afford. 

Voters need real solutions to overwhelming problems. Noel hears and understands this. His answers address actual issues, not seasonal boogie-men. Check him out. I believe voters will send a message that it's time to get to work and not just tell stories.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
California: Where Dreams are Shattered
by lavarr
Aug 10, 2010 | 109 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

How did California get into such a horrendous budget mess? Joel Kotkin, a leading demographer and futurist, documents California's fall from grace in a lengthy article on his web site.

Kotkin, the author of, "The Next Hundred Million: America in 2050," is no conservative Republican. In fact, he calls California Republicans "inept and often clueless." But he outlines the decline and fall of California, where politicians have become subserviant to the public employee unions. Notes Kotkin:    

Long a global exemplar, California is in danger of becoming, as historian Kevin Starr has warned, a “failed state.” What went so wrong? The answer lies in a change in the nature of progressive politics in California. During the second half of the twentieth century, the state shifted from an older progressivism, which emphasized infrastructure investment and business growth, to a newer version, which views the private sector much the way the Huns viewed a city—as something to be sacked and plundered. The result is two separate California realities: a lucrative one for the wealthy and for government workers, who are largely insulated from economic decline; and a grim one for the private-sector middle and working classes, who are fleeing the state.

Kotkin's analysis is a great lesson for other states, and makes one thankful to live in Utah, where politicians still act responsibly. Read the entire article here.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Immigration Requires Unique Vision
by lavarr
Aug 10, 2010 | 63 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

Immigration has been a hot topic recently and it’s a topic you’ll hear a lot about over the next few months. The Salt Lake Chamber has proposed an innovative state immigration policy… combining the need for federal action with supportive state action that protects the public and sustains the economy.

Utah is not a border state. Immigration affects us differently than other states, particularly those with an international border. The Chamber supports a solution that is unique to Utah and reflects our culture as a welcoming, friendly and international community.

Ultimately, immigration and border security are federal issues that require federal policy and enforcement. We encourage Congress to enact comprehensive reform and we expect our federal delegation to address the issue in a manner than reflects the values of our state.

The manner in which Utah resolves the immigration issue will have far-reaching effects on our state economy—for better or worse. Carefully crafted immigration policy can strengthen our state economy. For two years the Chamber has supported an employer-sponsored worker program that addresses many of the issues of concern. A summary of the program is available at slchamber.com.

We applaud Governor Herbert for bringing together interested groups to discuss the future of immigration policy in Utah. As the debate progresses, we urge a civil and constructive discourse.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
History Lesson: The Power of a Horse's Behind
by lavarr
Aug 06, 2010 | 113 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

(Note: This item was sent in by Ruland Gill, whose wit and wisdom know no bounds.)

The US standard railroad gauge (distance between the rails) is 4 feet, 8.5 inches. That's an exceedingly odd number.

Why was that gauge used?

Because that's the way they built them in England and English expatriates designed the US railroads.

Why did the English build them like that?

Because the first rail lines were built by the same people who built the pre-railroad tramways and that's the gauge they used.
 
Why did 'they' use that gauge then?

Because the people who built the tramways used the same jigs and tools that they had used for building wagons, which used that wheel spacing.

Why did the wagons have that particular odd wheel spacing?

Well, if they tried to use any other spacing, the wagon wheels would break on some of the old, long-distance roads in England, because that's the spacing of the wheel ruts.

So who built those old rutted roads?


Imperial Rome built the first long distance roads in Europe (including England) for their legions. Those roads have been used ever since.
 
And the ruts in the roads?  Roman war chariots formed the initial ruts, which everyone else had to match for fear of destroying their wagon wheels.

Since the chariots were made for Imperial Rome, they were all alike in the matter of wheel spacing.

Therefore the United States standard railroad gauge of 4 feet, 8.5 inches is derived from the original specifications for an Imperial Roman war chariot.

Bureaucracies live forever.

The next time you are handed a specification/procedure/process and wonder 'What horse's ass came up with this?' -- you may be exactly right.  Imperial Roman army chariots were made just wide enough to accommodate the rear ends of two war horses.

Now - the twist to the story:  A Space Shuttle sitting on its launch pad has two big booster rockets attached to the sides of the main fuel tank. These are solid rocket boosters, or SRBs. The SRBs are made by Thiokol at a factory in Utah.

Engineers who designed the SRBs would have preferred to make them a bit fatter, but the SRBs had to be shipped by train from the factory to the launch site.  The railroad line from the factory happens to run through a tunnel in the mountains, and the SRBs had to fit through that tunnel.

The tunnel is slightly wider than the railroad track, and the railroad track, as you now know, is about as wide as two horses' behinds.

So, a major Space Shuttle design feature of what is arguably the world's most advanced transportation system, was determined over two thousand years ago by the width of a horse's ass!

And you thought being a horse's ass wasn't important!
 
ANCIENT horse's asses control almost everything.

CURRENT Horses Asses in Washington are controlling everything else.

Remember to Vote in November.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Tax Workers 'Clear the Air'
by lavarr
Aug 04, 2010 | 54 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

Your friendly public servants here at the Tax Commission will be basking In Clear the Air glory come Saturday morning.

We, like 351 other agencies and companies, participated in the statewide Clear the Air campaign. Clear the Air is the only issue -- other than Mother’s Day and apple pie -- that Gov. Herbert, Mayor Corroon and Mayor Becker agree upon.

But when Mayor Becker issued the Clear the Air Challenge earlier this summer, all three were in the same ship. They encouraged their employees and people across the Beehive State to join the fun.

Throughout July a competition was held to reduce vehicle emissions by choosing walking, biking, taking public transportation, riding in a car pool and stringing errand trips together.

Nearly 90 Tax Commission employees participated in the event and recorded trips saved. Here’s our final tally:

  • Miles saved - 48,762 (That’s twice around the earth)
  • Trips saved - 3,393 (A weekly trip to the grocery store for 65 years)
  • Pounds of emissions eliminated - 81,720 (The weight of 9 average African elephants)
  • Dollars saved - $27,354 (Should cover this year’s Christmas bonus)
  • Gallons of gas saved - 2,212 (At 3 bucks a gallon, who’s complaining?)

At the Farmer’s Market on Saturday we will receive the team award for “Best Integration of TravelWise Strategies.” I’m unsure what the exactly means, but it sounds impressive. Hopefully we have done our small part to improve air quality, reduce traffic congestion and conserve energy in Utah.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Good Old Days Weren't Always So Good
by lavarr
Aug 04, 2010 | 77 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Bishop Introduces Federalism Resolution
by lavarr
Jul 29, 2010 | 88 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

Congressman Rob Bishop and members of the 10th Amendment Task Force plan to introduce a Federalism Resolution before leaving D.C. for the August recess.

The resolution is a statement of federalist principles that reaffirms Congress' commitment to the principle of federalism and the 10th Amendment. The resolution also acknowledges the historical purpose and relevance of federalism and recognizes that the cause of liberty demands that we return to Americans control over their lives and make government accountable again by bringing it closer to the people.

Following is the text of the draft resolution:

Recognizing that the cause of liberty demands that United States citizens have control over their own lives and government should be made accountable again to the consent of the governed, bringing it closer to the people and making it better able to solve their problems and serve their common good.

Whereas this is a Nation of States, and federalism is central to the structure of government and the very definition of American constitutionalism; Whereas throughout the history of the United States, most powers of government and the decisions that affect citizens’ day-to-day lives were to be made at the State level;

Whereas James Madison famously noted in The Federalist,‘‘The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined’’, and ‘‘Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite.’’;

Whereas the relationship between the Federal Government, several States, and the sovereign people is summed up most succinctly in the Tenth Amendment, ‘‘The powers not delegated to the United States by the constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.’’;

Whereas the structural division of powers and functions between the Federal Government and several States serves a practical and principled purpose that provides a double security against abusive or tyrannical government by causing each level of government to check the other in

the name of upholding the rights and protecting the liberties of the people of the United States;

Whereas ever-increasing amounts of regulations and laws emanating from the Federal Government, occurring in stages over the whole course of the 20th century but gathering particular momentum with the expansion of

regulatory government in the 1960s, have centralized and bureaucratized political rule in the United States, undermining the balance of federalism and threatening self government;

Whereas there are many areas that in recent decades have become Federal Government concerns but are better dealt with at the State and local levels of government including, education, transportation, health care, and homeland security;

Whereas this situation requires, and the very future of freedom and limited government depends on, a serious reassertion and restoration of American federalism and a real decentralization of government power and vast areas of policymaking from the Federal Government to States, local communities, neighborhoods, families, and individual citizens;

Whereas while recognizing that the restoration of federalism will require a widespread and extensive restructuring of government operations, up to and including the possibility of constitutional amendment to correct fully the

systemic problems of modern government, it is believed the best way to achieve the goal of real structural reform is by implementing practical but significant policies that will prove the virtues of federalism and begin the momentum toward change and build a new national consensus

for decentralizing policies;

Whereas under the current Administration, the ideology of big government has found a new voice and a new sponsor, and the results, from massive spending to the takeover of whole industries to new regulatory initiatives to

the explosion of debt, have been especially threatening and destructive to the idea and structural integrity of federalism; and

Whereas in an atmosphere where courts and the executive seem to be moving in the opposite direction, a new Congress must take upon itself the responsibility to limit the scope of Federal powers, extend the ability of the States to assert their legitimate powers, and thereby provide for the dynamism, opportunities, and creativity needed to solve problems, foster prosperity, and get the United States moving in the right direction:

Now, therefore, be It Resolved, That—

the House of Representatives—

(1) (A) recognizes that the cause of liberty demands that United States citizens have control over their own lives and government should be made accountable again to the consent of the governed, bringing it closer to the people and making it better able to solve their problems and serve their common good; and

(B) recognizes the historic and continuing importance of federalism and reaffirms its commitment to safeguard and uphold constitutional government as defined by the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution; and

(2) it is the sense of the House of Representatives that—

(A) this situation requires, and the very future of freedom and limited government depends on, a restoration of American federalism and a real decentralization of government power and vast areas of policymaking from the Federal Government to States, local communities, neighborhoods, families, and individual citizens; and

(B) while recognizing that the restoration of federalism will require a widespread and extensive restructuring of government operations, up to and including the possibility of constitutional amendment to correct fully the systemic problems of modern government, the best path toward achieving the goal of real structural reform is through practical but significant policies that will prove the virtues of federalism and build a new national consensus for decentralizing policies.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
America's Most Important Export: Freedom
by lavarr
Jul 27, 2010 | 212 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

Earlier this month Todd Weiler and I hosted and spoke for an hour to 13 leaders from Afghanistan who were visiting the United States under the auspices of the Department of State’s International Visitor Leadership Program.

They visited several states and their five-day Utah itinerary was arranged by the Utah Council for Citizen Diplomacy at Westminster College. They were in the U.S. to learn about combating corruption and increasing transparency in government.

Among the visitors were members of provincial councils, senior advisors to top elected officials, the director of counter-narcotics, civil rights chief, women’s affairs director, anti-corruption leaders, chiefs of police, and business leaders.

While in Utah, they visited with officials at the Utah Supreme Court, the Administrative Office of the Courts, the Utah Judicial Conduct Commission, the Utah Sentencing Commission, the Utah Republican Party, Lt. Gov. Greg Bell, and others.

I was asked to talk to them about political communications, using Utah Policy Daily as an example of how political information and services can be distributed at low cost.

We actually didn’t spend much time on political communications. They quickly changed the subject, and asked a lot of questions about how average Americans view Afghanistan and the war there.

I was impressed with how smart and knowledgeable this group was. But I was most impressed with how appreciative they were for America and American soldiers fighting for their freedom and stability in Afghanistan.

Obviously, not all people in Afghanistan feel the way they do. But this group of top leaders seemed genuinely thankful for America and how we are helping their country.

They asked us to tell our fellow Americans that our intervention in Afghanistan is just, proper, and is greatly appreciated. They greatly worry that support for the war will wane among Americans. They clearly want to establish in their country a political and administrative framework to ensure peace, stability and justice, but they fear their homeland will descend into chaos if U.S. soldiers leave before the job is done.  

Afghanistan is a long ways away, and most of us who don’t have loved ones serving there probably don’t think much about it. But it was interesting and heartening to meet with these leaders, struggling to establish in their country the freedoms and stability we take for granted, and see how much they appreciate America and want to emulate our best traits. As others have said, America’s most important export really is freedom.   

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Who Uses Social Media?
by lavarr
Jul 26, 2010 | 98 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

In its latest Policy Perspectives newsletter, the Center for Public Policy & Administration at the University of Utah has published some interesting information about the demographics of Social Media users.

The article by Megan Crowley is a followup to a previous article, Social Media Guide for Local Government,  about how local governments can effectively use Social Media. The article on demographics was written in response to a question by a reader who wanted to know what demographic groups use Social Media, how often they use it, etc.

Read the demographic information here.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Federalism Watch: Top 10 Developments in Federalism
by lavarr
Jul 12, 2010 | 173 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

 

 

A vibrant discussion is occurring throughout America today on federalism. Each week the staff of the 10th Amendment Task Force, prepres a weekly summary of 10 noteworthy developments.   

1)   Same-sex marriage ruling hinges on 10th Amendment.  A judge’s decision last week declaring that a state law allowing same-sex marriage in Massachusetts takes precedence over a federal definition of marriage has ignited a debate on both sides of the political spectrum on the proper role of federalism

 

2)    Centralized Power:  Fail.  Brian Roberts with the Texas Tenth Amendment Center makes the case that centralized power enables harmful legislation.

 

3)    Revitalizing Federalism.  The Heritage Foundation’s Robert Moffit recently published “Revitalizing Federalism:  The High Road Back to Health Care Independence” which explains why ObamaCare is a direct threat to federalism. 

 

4)    Restoring the Balance.  Peter Harkness, founder of GOVERNING, writes that in the wake of the Great Recession, states and localities need to face new fiscal realities.

 

5)    DOJ: Congress “entitled” to mandate individual health insurance.  The Department of Justice point man for defending ObamaCare claims that Congress is “entitled” to attach conditions to the dollars it provides to states.   

 

6)    New York:  A Case Study of Federal Addiction.  E.J. McMahon, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, demonstrates how states get caught in federal funding snares.  

 

7)    Cuccinelli Confident.  Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli is confident that Virginia’s lawsuit against President Obama’s health care law will be successful.

 

8)    One-size-fits-all-mediocrity.  In two related pieces, Heritage scholars Lindsey Burke and Jennifer Marshall demonstrate why centralized standard-setting will likely result in the standardization of mediocrity, not excellence.

 

9)    The Arizona debate intensifies.  The Obama Administration ups the ante by filing suit against the state of Arizona for its immigration law. 

 

10)  Wyoming, State Trust Land, and Federal Imperialism – Wyoming is confronting a uniquely western public lands problem related to state trust lands and massive federal land ownership in the West. 

 If you have an item to include in the “The 10,” please contact Cody Stewart, cody.stewart@mail.house.gov

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Featured_Businesses

We offer online strategies for promoting your business.

Upgrade Your Business

UPGRADE YOUR BUSINESS

Enhance your listing by upgrading.
today's headlines
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
utah tweets

With support from UtahWebStuff.com